Stay in the Loop
BSR publishes on a weekly schedule, with an email newsletter every Wednesday and Thursday morning. There’s no paywall, and subscribing is always free.
Ten ways to lose an argument
Another election is over, so let’s consider how awful we are at arguing. We lose arguments all the time. We don’t think we do, but we do, and it’s not because our opponents win them. They’re busy losing the same arguments.
No, we lose an argument the same way we lose a path through the woods. We wander off. We’re perfectly fine one minute, admiring a tree or a flower or, ooh look, a butterfly…bingo, we’re lost. We’ve lost the path.
Say one of these ten things, and you’ve lost the argument the same way.
1. Stupid
Calling somebody stupid is one of our favorite things to do online, after posting pictures of cats and complaining about work, but I hate to break it to you, it doesn’t matter if you’re smarter than the other person. Their position, whatever it is, is also held by somebody who is smarter than you. It’s the position that matters, not who happens to be butchering it at the moment.
Calling someone an idiot proves only that (a) you don’t know what’s being butchered, and/or (b) you’re just incoherently angry. Either way, you lose.
2. Evil
If they’re not stupid, they must be evil, right? Yelling “mean-spirited” or our term du jour is like #1, only angrier. The moment we’re angry, we stop thinking. Fifty percent of your neighbors, more or less, don’t vote as you do. Now, if you really, really believe that 50 percent of your neighbors want to starve poor people, or that 50 percent of your neighbors want ISIS or Ebola or Dr. No to take over America, then you have bigger problems than losing arguments. What misery your life must be, surrounded by all these despicable people.
There is evil, but as soon as you call someone that, you permit yourself to stop thinking. No point in arguing with a Nazi, right? Well, Hitler helped build the Autobahn and Eisenhower, the Interstate system, so give yourself a break. Crying “hater” every five minutes only blinds you to real evil, like what Hitler was doing when he wasn’t building highways. Be kind to your heart and figure out the difference.
3. Hitler
Shortcut for “evil.” According to Godwin’s law, the longer an argument lasts, the more certain it is that Hitler will be mentioned. We say “Hitler” when we’ve got nothing else. Same goes for “Rush,” “Commie,” “Fox News,” “Community Organizer,” or the evergreen “Fascist” and “Socialist.”
Know the shortcut’s origin. “Trickle-down” was coined by opponents of supply-side economics. In other words, arguing against “trickle-down” is meaningless because nobody believes in “trickle-down.” A metonym can be useful, but it’d better be a true one, and if you don’t know what a metonym is, then just stop it with the names already.
4. The F-word
Curse, and your brain freezes. It’s a waste of time, too, as it usually involves asking someone to do what’s physically impossible. A momentary spike of adrenaline slams you into an intellectual brick wall. Do yourself a favor: Use real words and pretend the kids can hear you.
5. It’s complicated
Political flacks use this more than regular folks, but “It’s a complex subject” is a neon sign flashing (a) “I Have No Idea What I’m Talking About” or (b) “I’m About to Lie to You.” If you can’t explain your position quickly, then you don’t know it.
6. That tired old argument
…is said by those who are beaten by that tired old argument. Often combined with #3. Repeating your opponent’s argument while rolling your eyes is not an argument.
7. Fundamentalist
See #1. There are five points of Fundamentalism. Look them up if you use this word. It’s used to make fun of Southern whites, but who else believes these points? Well, for starters, Northern blacks. Nuns helping alcoholics. Alcoholics. Brazilians, Chinese, Africans, Russians. St. Augustine, Bach, Martin Luther King Jr., and about eighty gazillion people for two millennia.
No, that doesn’t prove they’re right, and yes, Fundamentalists, Evangelicals, Catholics, Bach, and everyone else have differences, but even though you may think you’re smarter than all Fundamentalists (you’re not, not that it matters; see #1), you’re not smarter than Augustine. Trust me.
8. Yeah, but…
Change the subject and you lose. If A says, “Lowering the federal tax rate increases the amount of federal tax collected,” and B says, “Yeah, but what about the deficit?,” B loses. If B says, “Gasoline prices are lower,” and A says, “Yeah, but what about job growth?,” A loses. (A lazier version of “Yeah, but” is “Whatever,” which means, whether you know it or not, “Uncle.”)
9. I don’t know how anyone could believe in…
Stop. Don’t complete the sentence. “I don’t know” means “I’m ignorant.” You lose. If you don’t know how (fill in the blank), then find out how. And don’t search your favorite websites. Look at their websites. You might learn something.
10. I don’t know anyone who believes in…
If you don’t know any gay conservatives, anti-Darwin atheists, African-American Tea Partiers, Evangelical vegetarians, or gun-loving liberals, then you may talk diversity but you don’t know diversity. Look, it’s natural to like people who think like we do, but if we don’t know anyone who disagrees with us, we don’t really know what anyone else thinks. And without testing ourselves, we don’t really know what we think. If we don’t know what we think, why are we arguing?
How to Argue
There are more than these ten — like referring, ever, to how someone looks — but these will do. Arguing well, like doing anything well, is hard. But relax; you don’t have to argue. Nobody’s dying to know your opinion, and, guess what, they’re not changing their minds at your display of brilliance. So find out what the other side thinks, make up your mind (if you must), and keep it to yourself.
But if you want to take a crack at it, remember that William F. Buckley Jr. and John Kenneth Galbraith — arch-conservative and arch-liberal — went at it for years yet were best friends. The orthodox Christian G. K. Chesterton and the mostly atheist George Bernard Shaw, frequent debaters, remained deeply admiring chums.
They knew that respect and friendship and faith in the opponent’s character were more important than arguing.
Okay, now back to Facebook.
Sign up for our newsletter
All of the week's new articles, all in one place. Sign up for the free weekly BSR newsletters, and don't miss a conversation.